After months of scrutiny, Justice Mohammed Noor Kullow has been cleared of all allegations of judicial misconduct by a tribunal led by Court of Appeal Judge Patrick Kiage. The tribunal’s report, submitted to President William Ruto at State House Nairobi, dismissed the accusations and recommended that Justice Kullow be reinstated to the Environment and Land Court.
Background of the Tribunal Investigation
Justice Kullow had been under investigation for alleged judicial misconduct, including delays in delivering rulings and failure to communicate with the Chief Justice. The tribunal, which conducted a 10-month probe, found no evidence warranting his removal from office.
The inquiry aimed to assess whether Justice Kullow’s actions had violated judicial ethics or hindered the effective administration of justice. After reviewing extensive evidence and testimonies, the panel concluded that the allegations lacked merit.
President Ruto’s Statement on the Tribunal Findings
Receiving the report, President William Ruto emphasized Kenya’s strong commitment to upholding the rule of law and judicial independence. He praised the tribunal’s work, stating that the process demonstrated the judiciary’s efficiency and adherence to constitutional principles.
“The rule of law applies to all citizens, regardless of status. This tribunal has reaffirmed our dedication to a fair and independent judicial system,” President Ruto remarked.
Tribunal’s Verdict and Next Steps
With the tribunal dismissing all charges, Justice Kullow is now set to resume his judicial duties. The ruling reinforces the integrity of Kenya’s judiciary, highlighting the country’s robust mechanisms for handling judicial accountability.
Legal experts have welcomed the verdict, stating that it upholds the principle of fairness and ensures that judicial officers are protected from unwarranted accusations.
Impact on Kenya’s Judicial System
The tribunal’s decision is expected to strengthen public confidence in the judiciary by demonstrating that judicial officers are subject to due process while ensuring fairness in investigations. It also serves as a reminder that judicial oversight must be conducted with integrity, free from external influence or bias.
As Kenya continues to enhance its legal and judicial frameworks, this case sets a precedent for handling similar allegations in the future, reinforcing the nation’s commitment to justice and constitutional governance.